Pegasus

Navigate

Services

Premium Programs

Get Started
WePegasus Blog
University Selection

A government audit just showed why your IIM seat keeps getting pricier

IIM Rohtak CAG Report 2026: What the Fee Findings Mean for MBA Applicants

Gauri Manohar
Gauri Manohar
6 min read · Aug 30, 2026

If you are a CAT aspirant watching IIM fee tables climb every year and quietly wondering whether the number will still make sense by the time you graduate, the IIM Rohtak CAG report released on August 12, 2026 gives you something concrete to look at. A government auditor has now put figures to a worry many Indian MBA applicants carry: the fee keeps rising, and the reasoning behind it is not always written down.

What the IIM Rohtak CAG report actually found

The Comptroller and Auditor General audited IIM Rohtak's functioning and found that the institute raised its average annual student fee by 35 percent between 2018-19 and 2023-24, from Rs 6.40 lakh to Rs 8.64 lakh per student, while not preparing annual budgets to estimate its receipts and expenditure. Over the same window, academic receipts from its main programmes (the PGP, the Integrated Programme in Management, and the Integrated Programme in Law) rose from Rs 31.57 crore to Rs 125.91 crore, a 299 percent increase, according to Careers360's reporting on the audit.

The auditor's language was direct. Without a budget to assess actual financial needs, it said, "the fee structure seems to have been set high by the institute," a stance it called contrary to the mandate to make education more affordable. The CAG also flagged Rs 7.49 crore in faculty incentives and honorarium, a Rs 3.2 crore variable pay to the director, and 28 regulation changes made without documented ministry approval, as The Tribune reported. IIM Rohtak responded that it has been fully self-financed since 2019, keeps fees among the lowest across IIMs, and gives merit scholarships to about 15 percent of students.

The affordability question sitting underneath the numbers

Strip away the governance detail and one theme remains for applicants: an IIM that stopped writing annual budgets still tripled its programme receipts. That is the tension the CAG is pointing at. A public institute governed by the IIM Act, 2017 carries a not-for-profit mandate, yet its surpluses grew faster than almost any private coaching business would dare project.

This is not unique to Rohtak. IIM fees have drifted upward across the system for a decade, with two-year flagship programmes at the older IIMs now sitting well above Rs 25 lakh, per MBAUniverse's compiled IIM fee data. What the Rohtak audit adds is a rare look at the machinery behind a single institute's number, and the finding that the machinery was thin. For an applicant, the lesson is not that IIM Rohtak is a bad choice. It is that a sticker price alone tells you very little about whether an institute is disciplined with money.

If you are choosing between a newer IIM and an older one

The newer IIMs, Rohtak among them, compete on cost and access. Their pitch to a CAT scorer who missed the older-IIM cutoff is reasonable: a national brand, a lower fee than a private school, and a two-year runway. This audit does not undo that pitch. It does mean you should read a newer IIM's fee the way you would read any number without an audit trail: skeptically, and against its placement report rather than its brochure.

Ask the concrete questions. What was the fee three years ago, and what is it now? What did the median salary do over the same period? If the fee climbed faster than the median placement, the ROI is quietly thinning, whatever the ranking says. A newer IIM can still be the right call, but only when the fee curve and the salary curve are moving in a direction you can defend.

If you are weighing an IIM against an MBA abroad

For many WePegasus applicants, IIM Rohtak is not really the competitor. The real fork is a mid-tier IIM at roughly Rs 18 to 25 lakh against a one-year MBA abroad at two to four times that. The CAG finding matters here in a subtle way: it is a reminder that the "cheaper" Indian option is not automatically the financially transparent one, and that fee inflation runs on both sides of the decision.

Run the honest version of the maths before you anchor on either. Our breakdown of the true cost of an MBA abroad for Indian students and our candid HBS versus IIM Ahmedabad comparison both start from post-tax salary and currency, not headline fees. If you want that comparison built around your own profile and target schools, our MBA and MiM consulting work is designed to do exactly that.

What this means for Indian applicants

Practically, nothing about your Round 1 plan changes this week. CAT 2026 is scheduled for November 29, and IIM Rohtak remains a live option through the Common Admission Process. What should change is how you evaluate a fee. Treat any institute's number as a claim to be checked against its own placement data and its trend over time, not a fixed fact.

If you are trying to decide which IIMs and which overseas programmes actually fit your CGPA, work experience, and budget, a structured profile evaluation will save you more than a fee table will. The point of this audit, for an applicant, is that the people setting these fees are now being asked to show their work. You should ask the same of every school on your list.

Common questions applicants are asking

Does the CAG report mean IIM Rohtak fees will fall? Unlikely in the short term. The CAG recommended the ministry make IIM Rohtak prepare a long-term financial plan and rationalise fees, but that is guidance, not an order to cut the current fee. Expect scrutiny, not an immediate reduction.

Is IIM Rohtak still worth applying to in 2026? Yes, if it fits your profile and budget. An audit of financial process is not a verdict on academic quality or placements. Read its latest placement report alongside the fee and decide on that basis.

Are other IIMs under similar scrutiny? The CAG audits public institutes periodically, and fee and governance questions have surfaced at several IIMs before. Rohtak is the current example, not an isolated one, which is why comparing fee trends across schools is worth your time.


Sources verified on August 30, 2026 against the CAG report coverage by Careers360 and The Tribune, and IIM fee data compiled by MBAUniverse. Next review: January 1, 2028. Figures are drawn from the CAG audit of IIM Rohtak covering 2018-19 to 2023-24.

University SelectionAdmissions Strategy

Have thoughts on this?

We read every response. Whether it is a question about your application, a different perspective, or just to say the article helped, reach out.

Write to us